Thank you to everyone who has taken part. We are currently analysing the results, which will be published ahead of the ARM.
We represent doctors and medical students who, like the wider public, hold a wide range of views on physician-assisted dying. Since 2006, however, our policy position has been to oppose assisted dying in all its forms.
For the first time, we are surveying all BMA members for their views on what our position on physician-assisted dying should be.
This is an issue of enormous importance to the medical profession. The information we get from the survey will play an important role in our future work – by informing the development of BMA policy and how we represent our members.
About the survey
- We heard from 29,007 members – 20.1% of all members invited to particpate.
- This is higher than other surveys we have carried out of our full membership and higher than the typical market research response rate for this type of survey.
- It also means that this is one of the largest surveys of medical opinion carried out on this issue, ever.
- Our focus is now on collating and analysing the results and preparing for a debate and discussion at this year’s ARM.
What is physician-assisted dying?
Physician-assisted dying refers to doctors’ involvement in measures intentionally designed to end a patient’s life, covering the below situations.
- Where doctors would prescribe lethal drugs at the voluntary request of an adult patient with capacity, who meets defined eligibility criteria, to enable that patient to self-administer the drugs to end their own life. This is sometimes referred to as physician-assisted dying or physician-assisted suicide.
- Where doctors would administer lethal drugs at the voluntary request of an adult patient with capacity, who meets defined eligibility criteria, with the intention of ending that patient’s life. This is often referred to as voluntary euthanasia.
Eligibility for physician-assisted dying would be set out in any piece of legislation brought forward in the future. For the purposes of this survey we are assuming that the criteria would fall between the following boundaries to cover patients who:
- are adults
- have the mental capacity to make the decision
- have made a voluntary request
- have either a terminal illness or serious physical illness causing intolerable suffering that cannot be relieved.
Why we consulted on this issue
A motion was passed at last year’s ARM which asked us to poll our members for their views on whether the BMA should shift its position from opposing a change in the law on physician-assisted dying, to adopting a neutral position.
We wanted to hear from as many of our members as possible to ensure that any decision on our policy position - and our future work in this area - can be informed by the views of our wider membership.
What we asked
- your views on what the BMA’s position should be on whether there should be a change in the law to permit physician-assisted dying
- some additional questions about your views and the reasons for them
- for some demographic information which will give us some additional insight into our membership’s views.
How the results will be used
Your answers will be kept confidential by Kantar. The results will be analysed and published ahead of the ARM in June 2020.
The results of the survey will not make BMA policy. They will be published ahead of the ARM and provided to those attending to inform a discussion and debate on the BMA’s policy position.
Find out more about how BMA policy is made
The information that you provide in the survey will help us in responding to any future legislative proposals and put us in a much stronger position to engage on your behalf in the event of any future legal change.
What would each position mean for the BMA's work?
A decision on the BMA’s policy position will guide how we will engage with or respond to any future proposals for a change in the law.
An opposed position
A decision to remain opposed would mean that we would actively oppose attempts to change the law.
A supportive position
A decision to adopt a supportive position would mean that we would actively support attempts to change the law.
A neutral position
A decision to adopt a neutral position would mean that we would not take a view on whether or not the law should be changed.
It does not, however, mean that we would be silent on this issue. In any future legislative proposals we will continue to represent our members’ professional interests and concerns.
Learn more about physician-assisted dying
We have produced a range of briefing materials to inform and assist you in responding to the survey including:
- information about the law in the UK and how it has developed
- an overview of the law in jurisdictions internationally where physician-assisted dying is permitted
- some of the arguments used by supporters and opponents of physician-assisted dying, and for and against the BMA adopting a neutral position
- an overview of recent surveys of medical and public opinion on physician-assisted dying.
Listen to our audio briefing with Dr John Chisholm, chair of the medical ethics committee, and Ruth Campbell, senior policy advisor, discussing the survey and what you need to know about physician-assisted dying.